Credible Theories Sign in

The Radiation Storm

Close view of the growth rings in a cut slab from a tree about 1,500 years old
Close view of the growth rings in a cut slab from a tree about 1,500 years old

Thomas Quine (photographed at the American Museum of Natural History, New York, 2015). CC BY 2.0. Picture source

Within hours, a flood of fast particles from the Sun reaches Earth, the kind of storm that left its mark in tree rings in 774 CE.

Story: the first hours. Record: the summer of 774 CE, read in tree rings and ice

The story

What if the particle storm were as big as the one in 774? Minutes to hours after the flash, protons from the Sun arrive. They move almost as fast as light. Satellites feel them first.

In this story, some satellites start to glitch. Cameras on weather satellites fill with white speckles. A few spacecraft lose track of the stars they use to point themselves. Operators put the most delicate ones into safe mode and wait.

Airlines move flights away from the poles, where the radiation gets in most easily. Spacewalks are called off, because NOAA's scale warns of a high radiation hazard to astronauts outside.

Down on the ground, nobody feels a thing. The air above us soaks up the particles. But high in the sky, they hit nitrogen and make a rare kind of carbon. Trees take that carbon in. In this story, every tree on Earth quietly records the date.

That is exactly how scientists found the storm of 774. A tree ring from that year holds far more of this carbon than the rings around it.

What the record says

We find a rapid increase of about 12‰ in the 14C content from AD 774 to 775, which is about 20 times larger than the change attributed to ordinary solar modulation.

Miyake and others, Nature 486, 240 (2012), abstract

These results imply that the larger of the two events (AD 774/5) was at least five times stronger than any instrumentally recorded solar event.

Mekhaldi and others, Nature Communications 6, 8611 (2015), abstract

Satellites may be rendered useless, memory impacts can cause loss of control, may cause serious noise in image data, star-trackers may be unable to locate sources; permanent damage to solar panels possible.

NOAA Space Weather Scales, S5 (Extreme) radiation storm
What we actually know

In 2012 Fusa Miyake's team measured carbon-14 in yearly rings of two Japanese cedars and found a jump from 774 to 775 about 20 times larger than normal changes. The team first argued that neither a solar flare nor a nearby supernova was a likely cause. Later work changed that view: Usoskin and colleagues (2013) and Mekhaldi and colleagues (2015, using beryllium-10 and chlorine-36 in Arctic and Antarctic ice) concluded that it was most likely a huge solar particle event, at least five times stronger than any measured with instruments. In 2018 Buntgen's team found the same signal in 44 tree-ring records from five continents, starting in the northern summer of 774. The record shows a particle storm; it does not tell us how strong any magnetic storm that came with it was. That part is the story's guess.

Sources for this chapter

  1. A research articleAn article written by a researcher and published in a scholarly journal or book. Most such journals have other experts check a paper before it is printed, so it carries more weight than a news story, though later studies can still change the picture.Fusa Miyake, Kentaro Nagaya, Kimiaki Masuda and Toshio Nakamura, 'A signature of cosmic-ray increase in AD 774-775 from tree rings in Japan', Nature 486, 240-242 (2012) Archived copy, 2026-09-23
  2. arXivA free website run by Cornell University where scientists post research papers. Papers there may not have been checked by other experts yet, so they carry less weight than journal articles.I. G. Usoskin and others, 'The AD775 cosmic event revisited: the Sun is to blame', Astronomy and Astrophysics 552, L3 (2013), free copy on arXiv
  3. NatureThe website of Nature, a weekly science journal founded in London in 1869 and one of the most respected in the world. Its research papers are checked by other experts before they are printed.Florian Mekhaldi and others, 'Multiradionuclide evidence for the solar origin of the cosmic-ray events of AD 774/5 and 993/4', Nature Communications 6, 8611 (2015)
  4. NatureUlf Buntgen and others, 'Tree rings reveal globally coherent signature of cosmogenic radiocarbon events in 774 and 993 CE', Nature Communications 9, 3605 (2018)
  5. NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center, 'NOAA Space Weather Scales' (geomagnetic storms G1-G5, radiation storms S1-S5, radio blackouts R1-R5)

Updated

Discussion