Credible Theories Sign in
Less Than Credible · Questioned official findings

9/11 and the questions about Building 7

SpeculationSeptember 11, 2001 (NIST report November 2008)Less than credible: not fully documentedAlso called World Trade Center 7, WTC 7 collapse, 9/11 conspiracy theories, 9/11 controlled…

The short answer

A 47-story building near the Twin Towers fell late on 9/11 without being hit by a plane. Government engineers blame fire; critics say fire could not do that. Here is what each side has.

Source: Final Report on the Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 (NCSTAR 1A), NIST, November 2008

What's strange about this

The skyscraper no plane hit

  • World Trade Center 7, a 47-story building no plane hit, fell on 9/11 after burning for about seven hours, and for about 2.25 seconds it dropped at free fall. Why that is odd: Government engineers say fire caused it, the first known case of a tall building falling mainly from fire. Critics say fire cannot explain the speed. No investigation has found physical evidence of explosives.
  • The government's engineers confirmed the free-fall period only after outside critics measured it.

The record

On September 11, 2001, nearly 3,000 people were killed when hijackers flew planes into the World Trade Center in New York, the Pentagon and a field in Pennsylvania. The 9/11 Commission, set up by Congress, laid out the plot by al Qaeda in its 2004 report. This page does not question that the attacks happened or who carried them out. It looks at the questions people still raise, starting with the one that has the most physical detail behind it.

World Trade Center 7 was a 47-story office building across the street from the North Tower. No plane hit it. Debris from the North Tower's collapse set it on fire, the fires burned without water to fight them for about seven hours, and the building fell at 5:20 p.m. Video shows it coming down straight and fast, which led many people to ask whether it was taken down on purpose.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) studied the collapse and released its final report in November 2008. It found that heat made steel floor beams expand and push a girder off its seat at a key column, Column 79. That set off a chain of failures inside the building before the outside walls came down. NIST called it the first known case of a tall building collapsing mainly because of fire. After outside critics pointed it out, NIST also confirmed that for about 2.25 seconds the building fell at the speed of free fall.

A study at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, led by engineering professor Leroy Hulsey and paid for by the group Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, released a final report in March 2020. It said fire could not explain the collapse and that the building came down only because nearly every column failed at once. NIST considered and rejected explosives: it found no blast sounds loud enough to cut columns on the recordings and judged thermite highly unlikely.

Other common claims have official answers on record. Reports of unusual stock trading on airline shares just before the attacks were checked by the 9/11 Commission, which found that each trade had an innocent explanation; for example, one US investor with no link to al Qaeda bought most of the United Airlines put options as part of a wider trading plan. Security camera frames from the Pentagon attack were released in 2006.

The open question

Still strange: The skyscraper no plane hit.

Government engineers say fire caused it, the first known case of a tall building falling mainly from fire. Critics say fire cannot explain the speed. No investigation has found physical evidence of explosives.

The JFK police recording and the 'probable conspiracy' finding →
  1. Step 1 of 2 · This file9/11 and the questions about Building 7
  2. Step 2 of 2 · Next fileThe JFK police recording and the 'probable conspiracy' finding

Watch videos about 9/11 and the questions about Building 7

Found by a YouTube search, not checked by us. The player loads from YouTube only when you press play.

Where this comes from

EvidenceSpeculation

Comes from Final Report on the Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 (NCSTAR 1A), NIST…. The National Institute of Standards and Technology is a US government science agency. Congress gave it the job of studying why the World Trade Center buildings fell, and its reports were reviewed in public drafts before they were final.

What this means

The collapse and NIST's fire finding are documented. The demolition claim has no physical evidence behind it.

For 9/11 and the questions about Building 7, the idea goes beyond what the evidence shows. We cover it because people ask about it. The main problem: NIST's computer models were checked by many engineers, and fire-induced collapse of steel buildings is a known danger even if it had not happened to a tall tower before. No investigator has found…

An idea or reading that goes beyond what the evidence shows. We include it because people ask about it, and we mark it so it never gets mixed in with the record.

See all five labels

Sources

  1. NISTThe National Institute of Standards and Technology is a US government science agency. Congress gave it the job of studying why the World Trade Center buildings fell, and its reports were reviewed in public drafts before they were final.Final Report on the Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 (NCSTAR 1A), NIST, November 2008Primary text
  2. NISTQuestions and Answers about the NIST WTC 7 Investigation, NISTPrimary text
  3. The 9/11 CommissionThe National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, set up by Congress and the President in 2002. Its 2004 report is the main official account of the attacks; the commission closed and its website is kept as an archive.The 9/11 Commission Report (2004), chapter 5, note 130 on trading before the attacksPrimary text
  4. University of Alaska FairbanksThe Institute of Northern Engineering at the University of Alaska Fairbanks hosted a study of World Trade Center 7. The study was paid for by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, a group that argues the building was demolished, and it was not published in a peer-reviewed journal.J. Leroy Hulsey and others, A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7, University of Alaska Fairbanks (March 2020)Reference

Quotations come from public-domain translations. A book in our Library links to its Library page; other links open the free online copy or the reference page.

Updated

Credible or not?

Tap one to see how other readers voted.

Discussion